Each factor should objectively be assigned a commercial advantage or disadvantage score on a scale of -100 to +100 (-100 being a significant disadvantage and +100 being a significant advantage). If the factor is irrelevant to your invention, a value of 0 should be assigned. You should not base any decisions solely upon use of this form. Remember, this form is only effective if you are objective in evaluating your invention (hint: if you don't have any negative factors you probably weren't objective!).
EXAMPLE: If the "cost" to build and use your invention is much more expensive than conventional products you should give that factor a score between -50 to -100. If the "weight" of your invention is much lighter than conventional products you should give that factor a score between +50 to +100. If the overall size of your invention is not important to consumers you should give that factor a score of 0 as not applicable. You continue this process with all of the factors and then add the Total Score.
You should print out this form after filling it out for review later.
NOTICE: This website provides general information only,
not legal advice. You should not act upon this information without independent
legal counsel. You must read and agree to the Terms of Service
before viewing this website. The information on this website is not guaranteed
to be current, complete or accurate. All photographs and graphics on this website
are only for dramatization (i.e. they do not represent any employees, clients,
facilities, etc. of Neustel Law Offices, LTD unless expressly stated otherwise).
Neustel Law Offices, LTD is able to represent clients in all 50 states with respect
to federal law matters (e.g. patents, copyrights and federal trademarks). Michael
Neustel is licensed to practice only in front of the United States Patent &
Trademark Office (USPTO) and in the State of North Dakota. Copyright 1998 - 2009
Neustel Law Offices, LTD. All Rights Reserved.